For brokers · Expression of interest

Propose a broker for independent assessment

One legal entity. One jurisdiction. No documents at the EOI stage.

Expression of interest

Submit an expression of interest

Answer three short questions, then add your business details. Documents are requested only if FXContext decides to examine the proposal. An EOI does not guarantee assessment, inclusion, score, publication or favourable treatment.

How long has the broker brand been operating?
What would be most useful first?
Which company and market should we assess first?

Have you chosen the legal company behind your brand and the country or market to assess? For example: your UK company serving UK retail clients. No documents are needed at this stage.

Complete the expression of interest
Your answers will appear here before you send the request.
Security check — no tracking

Loading the security check…

Pilot routes

Two routes by operating history

More than five years: Top Brands. Five years or less: Prospective Brands. Age does not indicate quality or eligibility.

Top Brands

Top Brands assessment

For more than five years of verifiable history, with one defined entity, jurisdiction and sufficient evidence.

Choose Top Brands

Methodology 2.1 · 10 criteria · 80% minimum coverage

Prospective Brands

Prospective Brands assessment

For five years or less of verifiable history. Missing evidence is not treated as a zero.

Choose Prospective Brands

Prospective 1.1 · 5 criteria · 80% minimum coverage

Editorial example

Example pilot output

The published Pepperstone profileis an editorial example, not a pilot participant or client. Pilot work does not guarantee a rating, publication, traffic or leads.

View the example profile
  1. Entity and jurisdiction record

    Legal entity, authority and client context kept distinct from the brand.

  2. Source register

    Reviewed official and first-party sources.

  3. Evidence gaps

    What remains unavailable, inapplicable or unverified.

  4. Contextual rating, if eligible

    Only when methodology, coverage and publication gates are met.

  5. Factual-check stage

    Evidence-backed corrections without control over score or conclusion.

  6. Non-scoring improvement priorities

    Evidence priorities that do not add points.